Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Review of Leica SL

Subject: Re: [OM] Review of Leica SL
From: Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 09:19:46 -0600
Tina wrote:
> I don't really care anything about all of the controlled, repeatable
> tests.  I care about whether I can focus the camera quickly, whether I can
> take pictures in the dark, whether the camera is quiet and unobtrusive,
> whether the batteries last a long time, and if the resulting photos tell
> the story I want to tell. My old M6's still work great for all of those
> except the focusing quickly part.  That's why I got the SL.  So far, I'm
> happy.

I agree, entirely. Yet, what you just described is any Canon DSLR.
Once a camera achieves the basics of what you listed, you really get
into intangibles that set one camera apart from another.

There are reasons why Kodak Tri-X was the standard by which all B&W
films were compared to.

AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz