On 1/24/2015 5:58 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
Had this been pointed out earlier there'd have been no need of finding the
automated solution. :-)
Sorry. I thought this was obvious, so just let the thread go nattering on without commenting. You have to be responsible
for your own photographic equipment knowledge at least some of the time. :-)
Think about it. Does any program do pano stitching directly with Raw? Sounds really tricky to get the RGGB pixels lined
up, compared to lining up individual RGB pixels. PS certainly doesn't. It requires Raw input files to be saved in a
converted format before working on them.
You are certainly not going to find a camera that does it directly on Raw files, unless/until their processors become
much more powerful in the future. Even then, do you want the camera processor baking in it's decisions for you? PS
creates masked levels for each input file, so one may correct its decisions as necessary.
I have, and have had, several cameras with built-in pano capability, but have thought of it as another silly selling
point, compared to post processed panos. Likewise, some camera or other recently added the ability to clone out unwanted
things, but with shoddy results and JPEG only.
Hard Way Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|