It is a little strange, all I have seen from dpreview was Fuji does not
honest on their ISO, while others are at ISO1600 the Fuji is actually 1/3 to
1/2 stop less (i.e. ~1250) so it require slower shutter to get the same
exposure. In your case the Nikon image look darker at the same ISO, shutter
and F number.
I'm interested to see the Fuji RAW file as I have seen pattern noise that
should not happen.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philippe" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] OT: Recent debate on crop v FF - files I had promised to
Mark and john
Thanks C.H.
the exposures in the first and third pairs are identical aperture, shutter
speed and ISO
I made a mistake in the second pair though - the Nikon G doesn't have an
aperture ring and I don't know what happened … f4 instead of 1.4 as I had
wanted it to be …
Would you like me to post the fuji and nikon actual raws of either of the
other pairs?
AMities
Philippe
Le 18 janv. 2015 à 02:51, C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
It is difficult, the exposure looks different and there is no high
resolution details to compare. I can only see the noise of D700 better
than
the Fuji. The Fuji has strange pattern noise but the problem could be due
to
DNG conversion, it is just like shooting on a magazine page. The tone of
D700 looks more pleasing to me and the fuji lens also shown more purple
fringe :-)
BTW, I much prefer to use manufacturer's RAW file and converter.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message ----- From: "Philippe" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Olympus Camera Discussion"
<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015 1:38 AM
Subject: [OM] OT: Recent debate on crop v FF - files I had promised to
Mark
and john
During the course of one of our famous-the-world-over LUG-debates on
APS-C
and FF ;-) I had promised to post comparison shots of fuji and nikon
files
using the same settings.
I found time to rekindle my D700 today (16 months on the shelf, so says
LR) and shot 3 pairs of snaps at high ISO (1600 for I wanted RAW, and it
is the ISO limit of both bodies in RAW I think) and equivalent focal
length and aperture, respectively 35 & 50mm, both open at 1.4.
These are indoors snaps, without any other purpose than comparison - rain
prevented me from taking the cameras for a stroll.
The fuji being small and resting on a table for two of the shots, the
angles may be slightly different.
The light didn't change outside 95% grey, nor inside.
The links below will lead the curious of either list to dng files,
conversion is the only alteration I have made to them.
You should be asked a "mot de passe" aka password, type: charlie (the
first file might have a capital C)
1st Pair
https://filex.univ-lorraine.fr/get?k=qMDBdgufq6BRdADa6p7
https://filex.univ-lorraine.fr/get?k=bEkQMoqnd4f5rRIcBZP
2nd
https://filex.univ-lorraine.fr/get?k=yWV2vbE714whrsQdTcN
https://filex.univ-lorraine.fr/get?k=p8qodHHwn1xAbA4FJ2B
3rd
https://filex.univ-lorraine.fr/get?k=39AKF0uEw4123N0D50h
https://filex.univ-lorraine.fr/get?k=7gtbAMRKBQNxwEhU4I5
The files will remain available for download for 10 days.
Hope this helps all parties give enlightened opinions based on facts ;-).
Amities
Philippe
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|