Well, my Autumn shots (4 of them) were rejected for “Soft or lacking
definition”. Sigh!
Chris
> On 25 Nov 14, at 16:02, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> By the way, one tip for Alamy uploads:
>
> Space your batches out so you have only one mass waiting for QC at a
> time. If you get a rejection on one upload, it will tank all the
> others in the queue. Along with this, keep your upload quantity down.
> It only takes one rejected photo to have the entire batch rejected.
> And like I said, it will not only tank that batch but usually all
> pending batches.
>
> Once you have a relatively stable run of QC passed photos, they
> accelerate yours through faster. If you have a history of QC
> rejections, you get punished with slower QC approvals.
>
> Mine are currently in the slow lane because I've not been very active
> over the past year. That's the other thing that will stall QC. Those
> who are not consistent uploaders will get punished.
>
> Of course, "punishment" is relative. Alamy is really very easy to work
> with and "slow lane" means a couple of days.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|