It weights about the same as my Nikon 70-200 f/4. A real lightweight by my
standards, _but_, if I were going for lighter kit, I would eschew the 2.8 for
something slower and lighter.
--Bob Whitmire
Certified Neanderthal
On Sep 15, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Paul Braun <pbraun42@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just got an email from Olympus that they're accepting pre-orders on the
> 40-150/2.8 Monster Lens for delivery in mid-November....
>
> It's $1500, about what everyone was guessing. However, as my experiments are
> showing me, it can't be 10x better than the smaller 40-150 that I went with.
> Description says it weighs "less than 2lbs" which still seems pretty heavy
> for a MFT lens.
>
>
> Paul Braun
> Certified Music Junkie
>
> "Music washes from the soul the dust of everyday life.". -- Berthold Auerbach
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|