Nah, that'd never happen !
...Wayne
just hoping that there is no bias caused by commercial interests . . .
Chris
p.s. good luck to your daughter :-)
On 5 Jun 2014, at 16:29, Charles Geilfuss <charles.geilfuss@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Well there are lot of things that cause me to lose sleep at night
> (the diagnosis I made yesterday that will cause someone to lose a
> limb, my teenage daughter starting to drive, etc.), but dying from
> cell phone induced cancer is not one of them. For a number of reasons:
>
> 1. the lowest energy ionizing radiation (ultraviolet light) known
> to cause DNA damage is about one and a half orders of magnitude more
> energetic than cell phone emanations.
>
> 2. the very fact that they have had to look so hard for so long and
> have still found no increased risk tells me that if there is an
> increased risk it is so small as to be negligible; i.e. the increased
> risk is likely multiple orders of magnitude below your risk of dying
> every time you take your car out into traffic.
>
> 3. if there is a risk, you would think that after 20 some odd years
> of widespread cell phone usage we would be seeing an increase in the
> rate of brain tumors, salivary gland tumors, etc. There has been no
increase.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|