The first thought that hit me was that the blue cone was like a portrait
of a person with his feet out of the picture... something I was always
taught was a no-no. But that didn't fit at all. It's just an inanimate
bit of blue which I think adds to the picture. Don't clone.
Chuck Norcutt
On 4/8/2014 2:43 PM, Peter Klein wrote:
> I am torn between this original image:
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/P4060017.jpg.html>
>
> And the improved (?) version, where I cloned out the incomplete blue
> cone in the foreground.
> <https://www.flickr.com/photos/24844563@N04/13721913303/>
>
> The cloned-out version seems more correct, as I couldn't include the
> base of the cone, but I keep having this nagging feeling I like the
> composition and color scheme better with the blue cone left in.
>
> Whatcha think?
>
> --Peter
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
