Works for me. Maybe you could make it look painterly and print it on
canvas. Then it will look like "true" art and no one will expect it to
be in sharp focus. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
On 2/7/2014 11:29 AM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2014, at 3:58 AM, philippe.amard@xxxxxx wrote:
>> <snip>
>> Anyway, I consider a photo a keeper so long as its content matters to me
>> -blurred as it may be- rather than a sharp picture without any.
>> So just as Nathan said, I don't ask questions and shoot, from the hip ;-)
>
> Glad you said that, Philippe! It brings me to a shot from the Chapel Royal at
> Stirling Castle that I have been unable to delete, even though it fits most
> of my “trash it” criteria. Most assuredly out of focus. Badly. (Maybe the
> lost Fuji shutter shock? g>) Also a bit unbalanced (the people, not the
> photographer, though that might be arguable).
>
> But I like it. I like the color of the wall especially, but I also like the
> way some of the people are posed, particularly the woman and her husband,
> left center, who are both looking up, but in different directions.
>
> It just works for me. Would be interested in hearing thoughts from others.
>
> http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=11295
>
> —Bob Whitmire
> Certified Neanderthal
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|