That’s an interesting question, Chris. It certainly wasn’t the picture I
intended to take, but I appear to have stumbled into something.
What really wowed me was the light on the wall, and the windown silhouettes on
the floor.
But now I’ll be watching for similar thematic material.
--Bob Whitmire
Certified Neanderthal
On Feb 8, 2014, at 2:10 AM, Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I like it, Bob, and I'd keep it. But I wonder what you might do with it.
> Could it be start of a new theme of photography?
>
> Chris
>
> On 7 Feb 14, at 16:29, Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 7, 2014, at 3:58 AM, philippe.amard@xxxxxx wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>> Anyway, I consider a photo a keeper so long as its content matters to me
>>> -blurred as it may be- rather than a sharp picture without any.
>>> So just as Nathan said, I don't ask questions and shoot, from the hip ;-)
>>
>> Glad you said that, Philippe! It brings me to a shot from the Chapel Royal
>> at Stirling Castle that I have been unable to delete, even though it fits
>> most of my “trash it” criteria. Most assuredly out of focus. Badly. (Maybe
>> the lost Fuji shutter shock? g>) Also a bit unbalanced (the people, not the
>> photographer, though that might be arguable).
>>
>> But I like it. I like the color of the wall especially, but I also like the
>> way some of the people are posed, particularly the woman and her husband,
>> left center, who are both looking up, but in different directions.
>>
>> It just works for me. Would be interested in hearing thoughts from others.
>>
>> http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=11295
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|