Well, you caught me. I don't have Moose's talents for wizardry. This
is a very small crop, and the blue sky showed way more noise than I
would have expected at ISO 200. I made multiple passes through Neat
Image, and tried sharpening several different ways. I finally just
reduced the image size. I'm not sure what caused the noise. I have not
seen it before from this sensor.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 12/30/2013 10:07 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>
> Oh, BTW, what's with the artifacts in the picture? Is that a trait of
> the sensor in that camera? I've never seen artifacts like that before.
>
> AG (I REALLY hate the A319) Schnozz
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Thanks, Ken. My eyes are still in limbo, but that is what I see, as well.
>>
>> Jim Nichols
>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>>
>> On 12/30/2013 9:55 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>>> If it's a twin jet, the engines are mounted on the tailcone, and that
>>>> pretty
>>>> much limits us to a DC9 or derivative, and that ain't big.
>>> If you zoom in on the image, I believe it shows wing mounted engines.
>>> At least there are two bright nacelles, either side of the fusalage
>>> ahead of the wing. You can also just make out two or three pods on
>>> each wing with the 737 and A319 have. Both of those planes (along with
>>> the a320) look like wide-body planes from this distance.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|