Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM 100/2.8 question

Subject: Re: [OM] OM 100/2.8 question
From: Paul Braun <pbraun42@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:35:08 -0500
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 9/26/2013 1:22 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
> > Paul,
> >
> > Just a random drive-by thought...
> >
> > The 100/2.8 is likely a near ideal lens for your application, but
> > another to seriously consider is the 135/2.8. The extra reach may be
> > just what the doctor ordered.
>
> If I recall correctly, Moose made this suggestion early on in this topic
> of a lens for Paul in a dark theater.
>
> Why yes, you're right, almost a month ago, he said:
>
> "The 135/2.8 doesn't get a lot of notice, but it's a nice, relatively
> light, compact lens ..."
>
>
You did, in fact, utter those exact words.  Sadly, they got buried 2347
emails back, and then there was all the excitement about the 40-150/2.8
that I can't buy yet....

When I make my acquisition, you, sir, will get due credit.  You can share
with Ken.  Sharing is nice.

-- 

Paul Braun
Music Junkie

"Music washes from the soul the dust of everyday life." -- Harlan Howard
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz