| Subject: | Re: [OM] One of the best, IMHO |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:41:52 -0400 |
On 9/26/2013 6:04 PM, Ken Norton wrote: >> Don't you just hate it when we agree? <g> > Anoetic. Hmmm. I see the dictionary allows such a simple use of the word. But it literally means without thought, and refers in psychology to non-cognitive states of mind. I can see where it could be read as 'without thought' = 'unthinkable', i.e. not capable of being thought of? But it seems to me a sloppy usage. Pedantic Moose -- What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about? -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM 100/2.8 question, Paul Braun |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] EM1, Andrew Fildes |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] One of the best, IMHO, Ken Norton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] One of the best, IMHO, Ken Norton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |