Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Just how good is the 21mm f2?

Subject: Re: [OM] Just how good is the 21mm f2?
From: "philippe.amard" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:34:58 +0200
Le 24 juin 13 à 20:39, Mike Lazzari a écrit :

>> ...but it is best to leave any residual linear distortion alone.
> Yeah, what's the point. By the time you crop after distortion  
> correction
> you're back to the fov of the lens you shoulda used in the first  
> place.
> But hey,  maybe that's OK too.
>

Looks like the start of a semi-recursive process though:
21
24
28
35
50

If "flatness" is the target, get a 60 macro and pano (#1) hard for the  
rest  ;-)

Amitiés
Philippe

#1 : to pano, panoed, panini. Verb. from old french "not non" and  
italian cuisine dialect. Def. moving a lens up and down and sideways  
while on burst mode in order to cover the field of view you want to  
finally show, including margins for the seams. Stitch, adjust to  
taste, serve large. Source: Philichrome(c) - Metz - AD MMXIII


> Mike
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible  
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE




-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz