Brian,
I had a 28/2.8, 35/2, 40/2, 50/1.4, 50/2 macro, 85/2, 100/2.8, and 135/3.5
The macro, 100, and 135 were almost never used, and I alternated between
using the 35 and the 40. I liked the 40's rendering better but they're
just too expensive, so I doubt I'll replace it.
--
Chris Crawford
Fine Art Photography
Fort Wayne, Indiana
260-437-8990
http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio
http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work!
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798
Become a fan on Facebook
On 4/17/13 6:06 PM, "Brian Swale" <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Chris C wrote but I still have
>> two of my OM-4T bodies. Someday I'm going to replace my lenses, I miss
>> using the OM gear!
>
>Out of curiosity, Chris, what lenses on an OM body would most suit your
>photographic subjects and style?
>
>Brian Swale
>--
>_________________________________________________________________
>Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|