| Subject: | Re: [OM] more than one 35mm f2? |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Apr 2013 08:32:44 -0500 |
> All this in an attempt to answer a forum question for someone > (suggesting that glass is different in black edged version). I don't > think it is. Well, there was the occasional 35/2 that had a reversed lens element due to a manufacturing error. The diaphragm blades did get updated, though. Right? -- Ken Norton ken@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zone-10.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 15: town and country, Brian Swale |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] LR5 beta available, Ken Norton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] more than one 35mm f2?, John Hermanson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] more than one 35mm f2?, John Hermanson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |