Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Some new orchid photos and random complaining

Subject: Re: [OM] Some new orchid photos and random complaining
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 07:42:50 -0400
Awful light, no tripod, high ISO digital noise, underexposure... uh, 
huh.  You could have fooled me.  You're much too tough on yourself, 
Joel.  :-)

Chuck Norcutt

On 3/17/2013 9:38 PM, DZDub wrote:
> It would be my fate to go to a flower show the day after C.H. Ling posted
> his yearly quotient of pretty dumplings.  This was my second annual trip to
> the Quad Cities' Wallace Garden Center Orchid Show 2013:
>
> http://myweb.uiowa.edu/jfwilcox/
>
> C & C gratefully accepted.
>
> The results this year were a bit disappointing on a variety of levels.
>   Last year, not knowing what we would find but wanting to travel light, I
> took the E-410 and kit lenses.  I ended up using the DZ 45-150 for nearly
> all of the shots.  Aside from some strident bokeh, I was really pleased
> with that combination, the light, the color temperature, and the subjects
> themselves.  This year was quite different.  I thought I would better last
> year by taking E-620 and DZ 50-200.  As it turned out, the much lighter
> 45-150 just gave me fewer problems hand-holding.  Even with the 620's IS, I
> felt higher ISOs gave me better results.  The light was very even
> greenhouse light, but the overall conditions outside were muted because of
> cloud cover.  So I was shooting at 1600 most of the time and getting some
> underexposure.  The results were very usable but often quite noisy. I don't
> object to some noise, but I did some noise reduction on almost every shot.
>
> If you want to compare to last year, check it out in my Archives at the
> link above.
>
> I grow tedious, I know, but even the flowers were a bit off this year.  I
> noted in some of my photos (not those shown here) that the flowers were
> starting to fade and wither!
>
> So this may be good news to all but the 2 or 3 of us that like flowers --
> there aren't a lot of flowers to look at.
>
> Still, I had fun.  I should either have taken a monopod or the E-410 and DZ
> 45-150.  I made a mental note to try Ling's favorite, Z 180/2.8, on my
> OM-5D.  That is likely to require the 7 and 14mm tubes, however, and that
> would be a pain, but maybe some pretty Chinese ladies might appear out of
> nowhere.
>
> Joel (I can dream) W.
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz