ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Awww, poop.

Subject:	Re: [OM] Awww, poop.
From:	Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 04 Feb 2013 12:35:43 -0800

On 2/4/2013 8:52 AM, Piers Hemy wrote:
> I don't think checking it will make any difference, Chuck. Why not just
> stick with your assumption?

Schrödinger's lens

Erwin "Zoom" Moose

-- 
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Awww, poop., Paul Braun Re: [OM] Awww, poop., Jez Cunningham Re: [OM] Awww, poop., Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Awww, poop., Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Awww, poop., Piers Hemy Re: [OM] Awww, poop., Ken Norton Re: [OM] Awww, poop., Moose <= Re: [OM] Awww, poop., Chuck Norcutt [OM] Awww, poop., usher99 Re: [OM] Awww, poop., Moose Re: [OM] Awww, poop., Mike Lazzari Re: [OM] Awww, poop., Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Awww, poop., Sawyer, Edward Re: [OM] Awww, poop., Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Awww, poop., Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Awww, poop., Piers Hemy Re: [OM] Awww, poop., John Hermanson

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] IMG: Waiting, Tina Manley
Next by Date:	[OM] IMG: The Reluctant Patient, Tina Manley
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Awww, poop., Ken Norton
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Awww, poop., Chuck Norcutt
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]