Re: [OM] Awww, poop.

[Piers Hemy]

I don't think checking it will make any difference, Chuck. Why not just
stick with your assumption?

Piers

-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Norcutt [mailto:chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 04 February 2013 16:27
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] Awww, poop.

Uh, oh.  I'll have to check mine.  I've had it for many years and it has
always remained clear.  I assumed I had the exceptional case.  But I haven't
looked lately and will have to check again when I get home.

Chuck Norcutt


On 2/4/2013 12:49 AM, Paul Braun wrote:
> After seeing the mention of hazing on the middle element of the OM 
> 65-200, I looked at mine.
>
> Dammit.
>
> That was one of the lenses I had hoped to use with the E-M5.  Now I 
> know why my test shots were all very low contrast. I hadn't heard of 
> that problem before.  That lens served me well during the "film years".
>
> Oh, well.  Guess it goes on the pile of useless camera stuff and I have
> to start looking for something to replace that range.   I have the
> 75-150 which I can use, but it's not quite as long.  Neither one were 
> speed demons.
>
> It's always something, innit?
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/