Ken
My suggestions are:
1. Registered only.
2. 800px high max: having to scroll is a bit of a pain. I put up with it
on my little MacBook Air, but my iMac's screen height is 1080 and 900 doesn't
fit when you take into account the gubbins at the top of each browser window.
3. I don't understand.
4. Nor this one.
5.
6. They'll get there when they can.
Keep up the good work, old bean.
Chris
On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:29, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've got several specific open issues which need to be addressed:
>
> 1. Full-size image viewing. Everybody or Registered Users Only? The
> disadvantage of Everybody is that once the Google Crawler finds the
> site, the full-size images are fair-game for the world to see and use.
> The disadvantage of Registered Users Only is that when we link to an
> image, we only get the down-sized version until we log in and when you
> log in, it jumps you to your own gallery. Personally, I'd rather have
> it set to Registered Users Only.
>
> 2. Down-sized maximum image height. Right now, I've got the limits set
> to 900 pixels long-side. This creates issues on SOME computer screens
> as the image height exceeds screen height. But with other viewing
> systems (iPad, for example), it's a non-issue. I have yet to see a
> consensus on this. No matter what we select, I know that somebody
> isn't going to be happy. Personally, I'd rather keep it at 900. Ian
> Wilcox' picture is gorgeous on my iPad. I can trim the header down a
> bit on the page, that will recover a few pixels on the screen height.
> I'm so used to scrolling portrait-oriented pictures that it isn't much
> of an issue to me, but we really do need some consensus on this.
>
> 3. I was hoping that others would experiment with my sample TOPE
> Gallery by replicating an image into it. I know it works fine for my
> two sample images and as logged in as either AG Schnozz or as the
> admin, but I need a couple more of you to beat on it.
>
> 4. Icon visibility. These are GIFs that need to have their color
> changed. there is the transparancy channel that has to be maintained
> in getting those altered. I'll try to address those whenever I can. If
> somebody can do the alterations on those for me, I'll email them to
> you for editing.
>
> 5. Oh Moosie, Oh, Moooooooosieeeeeeee...
>
> 6. Last I checked, it looks like four people registered, but haven't
> uploaded a sample image yet.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|