Thanks, Mike, that's really interesting. The EM-5 equals or exceeds the
5D (and 7D) in every category except that the 5D holds a one stop
advantage in low light noise. Another big surprise though it that the
entire EM-5 ISO range seems to be overstated by about one stop. ISO 200
is really 100, 400 is 200, etc. I'm wondering how this relates to the
camera's own metering measurement vs that of an external meter. Could
make a big difference in, say, using an external meter for studio flash
work. Not a problem as long as you know it exists.
Chuck Norcutt
On 12/1/2012 1:40 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Chuck was interested in the OM-D comparison to the 5D classic. The
> measurements by DXO are interesting.
> As they measure it the DR at lower ISO's is actually better--quite an
> achievement. Hit on "measurements" in the comparison chart then "DR"
> The noise is lower at all ISO's on the 5D (but not by much) and the gap
> widens a tad as expected at higher ISO's. Perhaps Moose has confirmed
> this with real world
> comparisons but suspect he has been too busy with other things. The
> sensor is better than every Canyon APS-C--they had better get off there
> duff.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/d7lrz25
>
> When is the next big sale, Mike
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|