Should read "used them". Sp checker would not have helped with this one.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Nichols" <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Thoughts About Infrastructure
>I have a set of 3 screw-mount rings, and have used they with this lens in
> order to get shots of butterflies with the lens. But this limits one to a
> small focusing range, so it is not truly a solution.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "philippe.amard" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
> To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 3:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Thoughts About Infrastructure
>
>
>>
>> Le 29 nov. 12 à 21:58, Jim Nichols a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi Philippe,
>>>
>>> Yes, the 135/3.5 Tak is nice and sharp. I wish it had a closer
>>> minimum
>>> focusing distance, but one can't have everything.
>>>
>> extension rings are $1 each on the bay I presume nowadays ;-)
>> Ph
>>
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|