Re: [OM] TOP - DxO Gives OM-D High Marks

[Frank Wijsmuller]

As I understand it there are some questions about how independent DxO is
from the companies that fund it. Their methods and scores are not
unquestioned as well.

I don't know what you mean exactly mean by 'remain better camera's', but
I'd say it is not fair to call it just 'good -- for a µ43 device'.

Check this link: <
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Compare-Camera-Sensors/Compare-cameras-side-by-side/%28appareil1%29/793%7C0/%28brand%29/Olympus/%28appareil2%29/640%7C0/%28brand2%29/Leica/%28appareil3%29/619%7C0/%28brand3%29/Canon
>.

Best, Frank


2012/9/29 Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> I don't normally look at that site, so I might misunderstand the report,
> but it looks like a qualified report to me.  The camera is good -- for a
> µ43 device; those with larger sensors remain better cameras.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/