Lack of an eye-level viewfinder makes it decidedly uninteresting. I do
note what appears to be 3 additional electrical contacts at the front of
the flash shoe. But disabling the flash shoe in order to use a
viewfinder is also decidedly uninteresting.
Chuck Norcutt
On 7/20/2012 7:46 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Canyon's late answer to MILC:
>
> http://www.canonwatch.com/first-image-of-the-canon-18-55mm-lens-for-the-new-mirrorless-camera-it-means-its-an-aps-c-sensor-camera/
>
> http://www.canonrumors.com/2012/07/new-canon-eos-m-with-ef-m-mount/
>
> Details have been leaking out over the past couple weeks. Wasn't clear
> if would be G1x sensor or APS-c--appears to be the latter. No EVF and
> lack of physical controls
> look like major limitations. Perhaps there will be an external
> EVF--we'll see Monday. I have no clue where this fits in by doesn't
> seem to be even close in features/design to the OM-D. The mount name
> does imply some backwards compatibility to EF mount lenses. Lenses
> designed for PDAF don't seem to behave very well though using CDAF--
> CDAF designed lenses seem to work just fine for PDAF. It does look
> small.
>
> I don't think Moose will cancel his order, Mike
>
>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|