Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] K64 scan vs 5D II copy

Subject: Re: [OM] K64 scan vs 5D II copy
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:27:39 -0400
That looks very good to me.  There is definitely a blue cast to the 
whites but there should be as blue water is everywhere in the background.

Chuck Norcutt


On 6/25/2012 5:25 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
> I just have the original slide :-) It was shot 22 years ago, my elder son is
> going 25 soon.
>
> Ok, I surrendered, my eyes seeem not very good :-) I just consulted my young
> son, he has the best eyes in the family. Here is the version adjusted by
> him, he said it is difficult to get exact match but this one should be more
> close to the original.
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_0657A.JPG
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wayne Harridge" <wayne.harridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>> Well you have the original to compare with CH !
>>
>> I find the 5DII image seems to have a cyan cast while the 4000ED looks
>> more
>> neutral, so does the original K64 slide also have the cyan cast ?
>>
>> ...Wayne
>>
>> PS: How old is your son now ?
>>
>>
>>>
>>> As the Kodachrome scanning talk is so hot, I just made a test shot on a
>> K64.
>>> Output from DPP, no color adjustment, contrast -3, shadow +3, resize in
>> PS.
>>>
>>> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_0657s.jpg
>>>
>>> A previous scan from Nikon 4000ED with Nikonscan, no post adjustment.
>>>
>>> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/K10.jpg
>>>
>>> If you ask me which look closer to the original, I would say the one copy
>> with
>>> 5D II. The 4000ED scan looks a little cooler.
>>>
>>> C.H.Ling
>

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz