Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] K64 scan vs 5D II copy

Subject: Re: [OM] K64 scan vs 5D II copy
From: "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:42:38 +0800
Yes the clothes are whiter in the scan, I missed this point. The copying for 
Kodachrome isn't that straightforward.

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


> Cooler?  But the whites are whiter in the scan.  Brighter yes.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 6/25/2012 12:41 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>> As the Kodachrome scanning talk is so hot, I just made a test shot on a 
>> K64.
>> Output from DPP, no color adjustment, contrast -3, shadow +3, resize in 
>> PS.
>>
>> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_0657s.jpg
>>
>> A previous scan from Nikon 4000ED with Nikonscan, no post adjustment.
>>
>> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/K10.jpg
>>
>> If you ask me which look closer to the original, I would say the one copy
>> with 5D II. The 4000ED scan looks a little cooler.
>>
>> C.H.Ling

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz