Awright, Moose! Now that's a proper welcome to this list. <wink>
--Many-Times Moosed Bob
On Jun 12, 2012, at 1:38 AM, Moose wrote:
> On 6/8/2012 8:25 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> Yes, you are THE Tina Manley. Somebody get Moose a comb before he comes
>> online. I don't think I can handle the thought
>> of him doing Moosifications to Tina's photos.
>
> Too late!
>
> Hi THE Tina. AG is one of the majority contingent that thinks grain (or
> noise, in a pinch) makes most images better. I'm
> part of a small minority (one? two?) who believe grain is just an unfortunate
> byproduct of imaging chemistry.
>
> I think that if early photographic processes were grainless, nobody today
> would put up with it, seeing it as an effect
> to be used very seldom. That's not to say I dislike all grainy/noisy images,
> just most of them.
>
> All prelude to saying how much I like the image "Alejandrina Gomez Dominguez
> age 2" on the first page you pointed us to.
> Shot on film in 2001, in the dark, grain was a given. Still, I think it's
> even nicer without so much grain.
> <cid:part1.00090803.02010400@gmail.com>
> A much better job could be done with the original size, but I hope the idea
> is clear.
>
> Noiseless Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|