The problem was pairing times with aplenty, not times as such ...
Bien cordialement de Metz
Philippe
Le 11 juin 12 à 14:59, Joel Wilcox a écrit :
> Well, you must indeed be out of booze. If "times" can be plural, they
> can be counted -- unless you want to drag Kant into it.
>
> God's plenty to you!
>
> Joel W.
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Piers Hemy wrote:
>> Sorry, Joel, can't have that.
>>
>> Use "plenty" for uncountables, which "times" clearly is not.
>>
>> Having a fine time today!
>>
>> Piers
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joel Wilcox [mailto:jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: 11 June 2012 04:47
>> To: Olympus Camera Discussion
>> Subject: Re: [OM] An actual jpeg
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012, at 06:05 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
>>> Oh, horrors! You caught me.
>>
>> It's OK. Shakespeare committed that one, too -- plenty of times.
>
> --
> http://www.fastmail.fm - Email service worth paying for. Try it for
> free
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|