| Subject: | Re: [OM] Phase 1 dynamic range |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 8 Jun 2012 09:48:46 -0500 |
> Get myself driven to the local psychiatric unit that way. <g>
Nah. It's still a Nikon so you aren't totally whacked out. If it was
something oddball like an Olympus? Yeah, they'd be giving you shock
therapy. You'd never be able to be Vice President.
AG ('60s reference) Schnozz
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] (OM) OT Another phoitographer, Ken Norton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Olympus' future plans, Chris Trask |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Phase 1 dynamic range, Bob Whitmire |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Phase 1 dynamic range, Brian Swale |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |