Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] [OT] Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC

Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC
From: "Bill Pearce" <billcpearce@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 22:18:53 -0500
I have the progressive bifocals, and although they took a little time to get 
used to, I never had regular bifocals so that may have helped. The only 
problem  I have with them is the price
Bill Pearce
-----Original Message----- 
From: Chuck Norcutt
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 10:02 PM
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC

I don't know about the 24-70 but I'm with you on the varifocals.  My
optometrist convinced me about 10 years ago to try varifocals.  I found
them so perverse and disorienting that I returned them to him for a
refund that same day.  In the meantime cataract surgery on both eyes has
given me good distance vision and I only need resort to common reading
glasses for short distances.

Chuck Norcutt


On 6/4/2012 4:19 PM, SwissPace wrote:
>
> I am considering getting this lens does anyone have it in either nykon
> or canyon mount and would like to share how they find it. The reviews
> seem good nad Its nearly the same weight as the  35-80/2.8 but the
> autofocus and VR might help me up my keeper rate ;-)
>
> The recent talk of glasses got me thinking that I have been having
> problems since switching to varifocal glasses.
>
> IanW
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz