Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 120 million for The Scream, but a paltry 200 bucks for a piece

Subject: Re: [OM] 120 million for The Scream, but a paltry 200 bucks for a piece of history
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 20:43:44 -0400
I'm disappointed that the zooms are so slow. f/6.3 at the long end of a 
not so long lens?

Chuck Norcutt


On 5/3/2012 11:00 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012, at 09:46 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> Micro Four-Thirds is finally looking like it MIGHT have some legs, but
>> do I really want to hitch my horse to that cart? I really don't know.
>> We'll see how well I do in the fundraising department. I might get the
>> OM-D just because it's a stout LITTLE camera that looks cool and is
>> relatively inexpensive.
>
> I believe they've turned the corner on the old saw that a crop sensor
> doesn't provide the square MM to reach breakthrough IQ.  Like Chuck, I'd
> really like to see an EVIL FF body though.
>
> I'd want to take it out for a few laps.  Is Olympus bringing on the
> lenses that justify this?  I just have no idea.
>
> Joel W.
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz