Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Olympus E-5 and OM-D E-M5 bodies

Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus E-5 and OM-D E-M5 bodies
From: "Wayne Harridge" <wayne.harridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:22:31 +1100
Well they had a single lens so they qualify as an SLR !

...Wayne



> 
> > I got caned recently for describing the Fuji X-pro as a 'rangefinder'
> > but, to be honest, how else can you describe it?
> 
> If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's either a duck or AFLAC.
I consider
> it a rangefinder camera with evolved technology.
> 
> 
> > I'm attempting to write a book on the evolutionary history of the SLR
> > - wait for it and then you'll really have something to beat me up about.
> 
> Hiring the thugs now.
> 
> Technically, the E-10 and E-20 were SLRs. They used "reflex"
> technology for the viewfinder. But were they really SLRs? They didn't take
> interchangeable lenses.
> 
> AG
> --
> __________________________________________________________
> _______
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz