Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Olympus E-5 and OM-D E-M5 bodies

Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus E-5 and OM-D E-M5 bodies
From: Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:36:53 -0500
> I got caned recently for describing the Fuji X-pro as a 'rangefinder' but,
> to be honest, how else can you describe it?

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's either a duck or
AFLAC. I consider it a rangefinder camera with evolved technology.


> I'm attempting to write a book on the evolutionary history of the SLR - wait
> for it and then you'll really have something to beat me up about.

Hiring the thugs now.

Technically, the E-10 and E-20 were SLRs. They used "reflex"
technology for the viewfinder. But were they really SLRs? They didn't
take interchangeable lenses.

AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz