| Subject: | Re: [OM] Friday flowering tree |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:09:46 -0600 |
> Nice to receive the compliment, thank you. Well, let me put it this way: Had this type of digitized image quality been the "norm", Kodak would never have needed to discontinue Kodachrome. AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Protecting your biological settings, Chris Trask |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OT: Changing socks often enough? was Re: OT: Daft, Chuck Norcutt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Friday flowering tree, John Hudson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Friday flowering tree, John Hudson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |