Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] OM-D specs!

from Mike Lazzari

Subject:	Re: [OM] OM-D specs!
From:	Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:46:11 -0800

> I have always thought the E-620 to be the most desirable non "Pro" body.
As have I. It occupies a sweet spot between $$ and features. I don't see 
today (or yesterday) as changing that.

Mike
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] OM-D Official Announcement, (continued) Re: [OM] OM-D Official Announcement, Johnny Johnson Re: [OM] OM-D Official Announcement, Chris Trask Re: [OM] OM-D Official Announcement, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] OM-D Official Announcement, Joel Wilcox Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Moose Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Chris Trask Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Moose Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Chris Trask Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Chris Trask Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Mike Lazzari <= Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Mike Lazzari Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Moose Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Chris Barker Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Ken Norton Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Candace Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Ken Norton Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Candace Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Ken Norton [OM] Veering thread alert [was OM-D specs!], Moose Re: [OM] Veering thread alert [was OM-D specs!], Jim Nichols

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] OM-D Official Announcement, Chris Barker
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] OT: Snow, graves and a poet, Mike Lazzari
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Chris Trask
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Mike Lazzari
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]