What's the actual value of a *macro* lens that offers somewhat superior
image quality... wide open? Say what? :-)
Chuck Norcutt
On 1/24/2012 6:46 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> You are aware that the Tokvivron 90 is just as good and cheaper,
> aren't
>> you? ;^)
>
> So many lenses, so few camera bags.
>
> AG
>
>
> Hmmm,
> There was a thread a couple years ago in FM alt lens forum with dueling
> images with VivS1 90mm and Zuiko 90 f2. I have the former. The
> compulsive pixel peepers had their say.
> Wide open and stopped down a bit at lowish mags my distinct
> recollection is that the Zuiko indeed had a superior rendering.
> The owner of both lenses was clearly convinced as well. I think when
> the conditions are such for the Zuiko 90 to do a nice job it is just
> tremendous and worthy of the cult status it enjoys. I was skeptical of
> a discernable superiority until then. Nothing wrong with the vivS1 (or
> the Tok) though.
>
> Anyone want to trade, Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|