On 1/25/2012 12:38 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Macro Moose writes:
>
>> I now have that very Micro-Nikkor, but the 50/1.4 I have is newer and I
>> don't have the 50/2, so I am saved the
>> temptation of testing. ;-)
> Nope, I have the Z. 50F2 and you can test away next visit. It seems to
> have a particulaly nice rendering at non macro distances.
Context, Mike. :-) I had just been blathering about Nikkors, and the 50/2 to
which I referred here is the Nikkor I had
just talked about.
> MM further writes:
>>> Back on my grumpy 90/2 soapbox. Did they perchance try as close focal
>>> distances?
>>>
> No, ( but couldn't find the thread with a quick look) and I am sure
> your analysis at higher mags is correct.
Thought not, grumble, rumble, grumble.
> As an aside as long as we are on 90mm macro/close focusing, could not
> resist the CV90/3.5 in OM mount.
> It was available from Sweden LNIB. Not sure why I "needed" it.
1. Quorum
2. Jazz combo
3. Circus act, high wire?
4. One more for barbershop?
> It is APO and the colors can be "jewel" like especially greens for some
> reason...
> When I gaze with glowing admiration at the CV90 mounted on the 4T,
> have received a quizzical look from the CFO.
> It seems to say "perhaps I married a nut case."
There's been no doubt in her mind for many years. :-)
Carol thinks it's kinda cute when you get that look over your gear.
> As they say at the Moose's, at least it's not heroin.
And not just about camera gear. ;-)
Bags Hats Jackets Books Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|