Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Strike one up for the underground protest

Subject: Re: [OM] Strike one up for the underground protest
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:56:30 +1100
I'm proud to announce that I did not understand one word of this. Well, to be 
fair, I know what an accordion is but I'd rather not see one reshaped before 
the packet ship reaches port. 
Who are they and how are you screwing me?
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 23/12/2011, at 10:42 PM, David Thatcher wrote:

> A large Aussie telco does exactly this on business grade "private IP"
> networks. The hard ingress rate-limit causes random packet discards
> (instead of nice sensible queue tail drops)  with the result that
> sustained TCP connections end up getting (on average) less than 10% of
> the bandwidth as the TCP window size "accordions" due the stupid packet
> loss. The workaround is to traffic shape on the customer equipment
> before the port, but this means the client needs to fork out for more
> gear. It's nice for our bottom line, but from a 'best practice'
> standpoint, it's utter rubbish.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz