| Subject: | Re: [OM] [OT] In depth SUV scientific based analysis (was TotallyOT |
|---|---|
| From: | Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 28 May 2011 10:42:47 +0100 |
Exactamundo, Bob. But the idea behind the phrase escapes many people, so it's no wonder it's misused (or "evolved" . . .). Chris On 27 May 2011, at 17:57, Piers Hemy wrote: > That's wrong. Not to be pedantic (ouch!), but begging the question properly > means something more like circular reasoning. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] [OT] In depth SUV scientific based analysis (was TotallyOT, Bill Pearce |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] [IMGs] Yosemite gallery growing, Brian Swale |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] [OT] In depth SUV scientific based analysis (was TotallyOT, Bob Whitmire |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] [OT] In depth SUV scientific based analysis (was TotallyOT, Bob Whitmire |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |