ML Archiv: Re: [OM] camera raw 6.3

Subject:	Re: [OM] camera raw 6.3
From:	Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 07:19:47 -0400

Yes, by a lot!

Chuck Norcutt

On 3/16/2011 1:31 PM, John Hudson wrote:
>
>
> Would an increase in the ISO rating from 80 to say 200 on your [mere 12MP
> !?] p&s have generated even more noise ?
>
> jh
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] E-5 and engineers..., (continued) Re: [OM] E-5 and engineers..., Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] E-5 and engineers..., Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] E-5 and engineers..., Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] E-5 and engineers..., Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] E-5 and engineers..., Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] E-5 and engineers..., Moose Re: [OM] E-5 and engineers..., Chuck Norcutt [OM] camera raw 6.3, John Hudson Re: [OM] camera raw 6.3, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] camera raw 6.3, John Hudson Re: [OM] camera raw 6.3, Chuck Norcutt <= Re: [OM] camera raw 6.3, John Hudson Re: [OM] camera raw 6.3, Moose Re: [OM] camera raw 6.3, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] E-5 and engineers..., Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] E-5 and engineers..., Ken Norton Re: [OM] E-5 and engineers..., Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] E-5, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] E-5, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] E-5, Chris Barker Re: [OM] E-5, John Hudson

Previous by Date:	[OM] (OM) OT of nothing in particular, Brian Swale
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] IMG: White on White, Chuck Norcutt
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] camera raw 6.3, John Hudson
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] camera raw 6.3, John Hudson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]