Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OT: Use of verbs, was Re: olympus Digest, Vol 27, Issue 31

Subject: Re: [OM] OT: Use of verbs, was Re: olympus Digest, Vol 27, Issue 31
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:44:47 +1100
No, it is technically correct - a consistency in Saxon verbs but it grates on 
English-speaking ears because no-one outside Castle Murica has used it in four 
hundred years or so. And in any case, usually it is redundant - just leaving it 
out makes no difference. 
I can't believe that well-educated Americans are still using it - Zounds!

Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 01/02/2011, at 5:37 AM, Walters, Martin wrote:

> Jan discovered Canadian English, which is neither American nor British,
> and probably to the chagrin of both.  You also need to remember that
> English is nothing, if not inconsistent. Just because the PP of "forget"
> is "forgotten", doesn't mean that PP of "get" is "gotten". 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz