Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [OM] OT: Use of verbs, was Re: olympus Digest, Vol 27, Issue 31

from Andrew Fildes
Subject: Re: [OM] OT: Use of verbs, was Re: olympus Digest, Vol 27, Issue 31
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:21:22 +1100 
Or just an affectation?
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 31/01/2011, at 5:45 AM, Jan Steinman wrote:

> Is mixing past tense with past perfect tense a particularly American affect?

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [OM] Changes on the Zone-10 Front, Andrew Fildes
Next by Date:  Re: [OM] Changes on the Zone-10 Front, Wiliam Wagenaar
Previous by Thread:  Re: [OM] OT: Use of verbs, was Re: olympus Digest, Vol 27, Issue 31, Chris Barker
Next by Thread:  Re: [OM] Bokeh, shmokeh [was Heliar (Was: 50mm 1.8 (Re: Hoarding & Varimagni))], Carlos J. Santisteban
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz