ML Archiv: Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels

from Ken Norton

Subject:	Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels
From:	Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:43:45 -0600

> But I also have the book with the same prints, and to tell the truth, I like 
> the
> book prints a whole lot better. Heresy or not.

I have the Yosemite and the Range of Light book. I think the images in
it are particularily good. No heresy with me.

AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, (continued) Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Ken Norton Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Bill Pearce Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Bill Pearce Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Chris Crawford Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Nathan Wajsman Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Jan Steinman Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Bill Pearce Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Brian Swale Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Ken Norton <= Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Bill Pearce Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Ken Norton Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Bill Pearce Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Ken Norton Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Bill Pearce Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Bill Pearce

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] OT, was Auto Bellows on Olympus and Canon digital SLRs, Piers Hemy
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] OT Internet connection speed, John Hermanson
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Brian Swale
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] IMG: 280 megapixels, Bill Pearce
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]