Count me as a rider on the 50/3.5 bandwagon...
it's the lens I keep going back to for all reasons.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Piers Hemy <piers@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I know another lister sold his 50/3.5 only to experience severe regret
> within a couple of years. He went to inordinate lengths to retrieve his
> lost
> "precious" - if memory serves, he even had to resort to tales of what
> elemental sodium could do if misused....
>
> My lips are sealed, of course, but "you know who you are"..
>
> Piers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Norton [mailto:ken@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 18 January 2011 17:08
> To: Olympus Camera Discussion
> Subject: Re: [OM] 50 Macros
>
> > My take is the 50/3.5 is a serious bargain.
>
>
> Agreed! Not too long ago I sold mine to fund the PanaLeica purchase.
> Although I feel as though I did get the better end of the deal, not having
> the 50/3.5 is somewhat a shock to the system. It is simply a fabulous lens
> and easily the best $75 lens out there.
> --snip
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|