ML Archiv: Re: [OM] 0.95

Subject:	Re: [OM] 0.95
From:	AS <alizookoman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:49:46 -0500

Is ISO 12500 just a marketing gimmick? I have yet to see an image taken that 
high. 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] 0.95, (continued) Re: [OM] 0.95, Jim Nichols Re: [OM] 0.95, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] 0.95, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] 0.95, Stephen Troy [OM] A worthwhile 30mins, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] 0.95, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] 0.95, Stephen Troy Re: [OM] 0.95, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] 0.95, Joel Wilcox Re: [OM] 0.95, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] 0.95, AS <= Re: [OM] 0.95, Jeff Keller Re: [OM] 0.95, Ken Norton Re: [OM] 0.95, Jeff Keller Re: [OM] 0.95, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] 0.95, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] 0.95, Bill Pearce Re: [OM] 0.95, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] 0.95, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] 0.95, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] 0.95, Chuck Norcutt

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Saving the planet or just saving money?, Moose
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Saving the planet or just saving money?, Moose
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] 0.95, Chuck Norcutt
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] 0.95, Jeff Keller
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]