Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] (OT) G12 vs OM Film

Subject: Re: [OM] (OT) G12 vs OM Film
From: Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:33:26 -0500
Which is a load of bogus crud. What happens when you scale the image
to the equivalent of, say, 260 ppi? Does the image turn to junk? Of
course not.

AG

On Monday, October 25, 2010, John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dawid Loubser" <dawidl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [OM] (OT) G12 vs OM Film
>
>
>>
>> As a test, I have had made (some years ago) a ~ 100cm x 80cm high
>> quality print
>> of this image (not otherwise great, but technically at the limits of
>> what was achievable
>> in 2002 with a compact digital camera):
>>
>> http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs10/i/2006/115/3/b/Progressive_by_philosomatographer.jpg
>
> Interesting:
>
> What was the pixels per inch resolution of the file that was sent to the
> printer ?
>
> As I understand it 300 ppi is adequate for a high quality close up, say a
> viewing distance of 36" or less, but less than 300 ppi will suffice the
> further away one is from the print.
>
> jh
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>

-- 
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz