On 20 September 2010 13:20, Piers Hemy <piers@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ah, I thought the 1.44M *was* the LCD. In which case, double wow.
Actually, I don't understand that bit of the copy at all. It says
that the evf, like the ovf, is parallax corrected for the focal
distance. If it's a live view, taken from the imaging sensor, then
there should be no need for parallax correction, surely? Also, the
illustration shows an lcd panel for display information, but doesn't
say anything about it being a live view screen. There doesn't seem to
be any mention or illustration of a method of blocking out the optical
view when using the electronic viewfinder either.
--
Stand firm for what you believe in, until and unless logic and experience
prove you wrong. Remember: when the emperor looks naked, the emperor *is*
naked, the truth and a lie are not "sort-of the same thing" and there is
no aspect, no facet, no moment of life that can't be improved with pizza.
-Daria Morgendorffer
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|