Re: [OM] Feeding the rumor mill

[Chuck Norcutt]

I don't consider it "unreasonable" for such a specialized product.  But 
that doesn't change the fact that it's still very expensive.  :-)

Chuck Norcut


On 9/9/2010 6:33 AM, Wayne Harridge wrote:
>>
>> Gulp!  400NC in 20x24 will cost you... (ready now?)... $86/shot.  It
>> looks like Kodak needs a minimum order of $15,000 to fire up the
>> equipment.  Maybe there really is a market for Canon's 8x8" sensor.  :-
>> )
>>
>
> Sounds reasonable to me for such a specialised size, consider that it has
> about 6 times the area of a 35mm 36 exposure film (not frame).
>
> ...Wayne
>
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/