Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] (OM), yes, real OM for a change

Subject: [OM] (OM), yes, real OM for a change
From: usher99@xxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:23:19 -0400
Thanks Moose and Chuck for the clarification.   I learn something every 
day on the list.

Alan Wood site  lists early versions as single element which is 
probably why I recalled it that way.  I would bet the $94.00 one for 
the IS-3
was 2 element.

http://www.alanwood.net/photography/olympus/close-up-lenses.html

Must be quite difficult to preserve IQ with 6 diopters.  On an 80mm 
lens that is about a mag of 1:2 at infinity.  Not sure how the mag gets 
to 2:1
on the autotube, but it clearly doesn't focus at infinity.

Mike

BTW,  I think the Nikon 2 element  guys were taken off the market a 
couple years ago,  though the pricey Canyon ones are still available 
new.
Stephen Gandy said the close up diopter  included with the  CV SL11 
90mm is single element.  Go figure.


> I didn't realize the FL of the screw -in diopter.  I don't think it 
is a 2
> element apo design.  I don't think Dean was thrilled with the results.

Two element. <http://www.angelfire.com/ca/erker/closeups.html>

As it says, though, I believe 2 element is acro, not apo. Not even sure 
if such
designations are meaningful in context,
as the lenses they are put in front of are usually not apochromatic.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz