Or maybe Panasonic and Leica paid for a placement fee. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> I think it reflects pseudo-science, or bullshit in common parlance...
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
> YNWA
>
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 11, 2010, at 10:34 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>> Not exactly a dissertation but I did consider it highly unusual that
>> Panasonic micro 4/3 and Leica P&S cameras made the top of the list for
>> the photo attractiveness score... blowing away all the DSLRs. These
>> cameras can't be very numerous yet. Also peculiar is that cameras with
>> greater depth of field and non-P&S cameras fare generally worse than
>> other camera types. That would imply that micro 4/3 and the Leica P&S
>> should be at a disadvantage to the DSLRs... but they weren't.
>>
>> Does this somehow reflect the demographic of those who took the photos?
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> Joel Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> I want an iPhone.
>>> You'll need it since your Olympus equipment apparently makes you
>>> repulsive. Oh wait, you're PanaLeica now. You're gorgeous, dood!
>>>
>>> But I'm waiting for Chuck's dissertation on the credibility of the
>>> research first.
>>>
>>> Joel W.
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|