Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] IMG: Higher Resolution Cleome Image

Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Higher Resolution Cleome Image
From: "Jim Nichols" <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 13:30:43 -0500
Hi Chuck,

There are a number of constraints when trying to display images on line. 
The camera delivers 240 pixels/inch, getting close to your target of 300, 
but, if when I tried to display a large image on the LUG gallery, I 
encountered the gallery-imposed limit of 10MB per image.  I reduced the size 
to get below that, but left the resolution at 240.  On my Epson R800 
printer, I can only go up to 8.5 x 11, so it is not worthwhile to try a 
print to prove anything.

However, when I display this latest TIFF image to my full screen size, I 
can't discern a fall-off in definition in the area of the original image I 
displayed.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Higher Resolution Cleome Image


> Sorry, I guess I didn't make myself clear.  I was not disparaging Jim,
> or the E-510 or the 35/3.5 macro.  I was only talking about the apparent
> depth of field... that what appeared sharp in the far background (the
> furthest extent of the DOF) on a small screen image would not be so
> sharp on an 8x10 print.  The size of your image is only 1129 pixels
> vertically.  When printed 8x10 the resolution (without interpolation) is
> only 141 pixels/inch.  At normal reading distance typical human vision
> (not counting Moose) requires 300 pixels per inch such that we don't
> discern the pixels.  This image can't be printed larger than 4x5 to
> accomplish that.  That doesn't mean you still can't make a good looking
> 8x10 with interpolation but I believe the apparent depth and some of the
> sharpness of the small image will be lost in the enlargement.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Jim Nichols wrote:
>> Chuck, et al,
>>
>> I think the Cleome image would print well at 8x10 or larger.  Here is
>> a slightly larger crop, to show some of the OOF elements as well as
>> the area in the original image.  This was saved as a TIFF image,
>> around 9MB, and should be viewed large by clicking on the box symbol
>> at the top or bottom of the page.
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Cleome_+Another+Crop.tif.html
>>
>>
>> I think that you are selling the E-510/ZD 35/3.5 Macro capability
>> short.
>>
>> Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
> 


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz